Tears for Steve Jobs

The 19th Jihlava IDFF will show a premiere of a documentary film by the academy award-winning director Alex Gibney, Steve Jobs: Man in the Machine, about the emotional bond that can form between a man and a technical device.

This time, our situation review brought together Bára Kopecká (BK), also an author of documentary DK (2013), psychologist and personal coach Martin Sedláček (MS) and a successful founder of the Skypicker start-up for on-line search of cheap flights, Oliver Dlouhý (OD).

MS: Today, companies are usually managed by people who need to have absolute power and control and this position helps them assert their visions. And it is extremely strenuous and exhausting to work with someone like this in the long term. Jobs didn’t tolerate below-average performance – and expected the maximum from himself and his employees. He only knew one speed – full-on. He clearly demonstrated some dictator character traits, but at the same time, he was aware that he was a genius – for instance during the Think Different campaign, when he inadvertently mentioned himself in association with such great thinkers as Gandhi, Einstein and Muhammad Ali. In a way, he saw himself as a messiah and innovator.

BK: In one scene shot during the campaign, Jobs says that if people like Gandhi and Einstein had had the chance, they would have used the iPhone. But that’s marketing – Jobs wanted to maximise the sales. However, the film takes it out of the context creating the impression that he himself wanted to count as one of the geniuses. He wasn’t as stupid as to tell several hundred people: look I am as great as Gandhi or Einstein.

MS: But that wouldn’t have been stupid, on the contrary! When someone believes in what he or she is saying, then it’s not stupid. And Jobs had the confidence and capacity to do that.

BK: Then he would have to have been a megalomaniac.

OD: But he was one. It would be a different situation if he had declared it about himself, which he hadn’t done.

BK: I can see characteristics typical for a visionary who spares no-one, is uncompromising, bossy, cruel, which, however, does not mean that he is out of his senses. He was intelligent, not so crazy as to try to place himself on a pedestal. A visionary derives from the term “vision”, not “ego”. As if the film was trying hard to create an opposite image – of a madman on a pedestal.

Making history

OD:  Jobs was a creative mind whose goal was to move onwards, to solve a problem. Unlike others such as Elon Musk, the founder of Tesla Motors, he was more focused on marketing. At the same time, I don’t think that his main motivation was profit. He wanted his products to be used by as many people as possible and that’s also why he insisted on their perfection and simplicity.

MS: Thanks to his charisma, he managed to make his people give up their family life and work overtime to actually become embodied in the final products. The rhetoric – we are not developing a phone, we are writing history – made the involved think they were a part of something big. And we feel the same, when holding an iPhone in our hand, we feel like we are participating in that history too.

BK: This documentary could have been a subjective piece of journalism, made in the so-called gonzo style, but the author is not much present to actually expressly admit that he is biased. When you are looking for answers you first ask questions and then gradually proceed to exploring various perspectives. Gibney chose a negative, even a vaguely related event, for instance suicides in China, and put them in connection with money, and then he asks a rhetorical question: And didn’t Jobs do it mainly for the money? But this is what a lecture, not a documentary, looks like.

Biased biography

OD: Well we can’t tell that Jobs was accountable for the suicides of his employees in China, I would not demonise Jobs like that. He himself actually pointed it out when explaining that considering that he had several hundred thousand employees all over the world, suicides were inevitable according to the statistics. After all, people weren’t forced to work for him. The working conditions in China are way below our standards, but compared to their standards, the work for Foxconn is still the better option.

BK: But the negative perspective cannot capture the complex nature of his personality, which is why we can’t watch the film only as a portrait. I don’t know why documentaries often mix the category of art and journalism. In the case of this film, we can’t speak about art, because art works with the implicit, with aesthetics, and form, using emotions as a means of expression and information to evoke them, but in this case, we have an imbalanced mix of indistinct comments from talking heads chosen according to some strange key, excerpts from news programmes and several mechanically incorporated takes of the landscape which do not convey any emotion.

OD: I was wondering what message not only the trees but the whole work was supposed to convey. But I’m still wondering. As if it was some randomly collected footage put in a chronological order, one event after another. I was missing a connecting link that would point me in the right direction or at least indicate where the truth lies and if we can actually find it.

BK: In journalistic terms, the film is not very good either. We can ask why people were crying when Steve Jobs died, but to be able to answer that question, we would have to focus on those who were crying, the whole Apple phenomenon and its products. Instead, we see an incomplete and one-sided picture.

MS: The audience doesn’t understand why these people were crying. We can see one of Jobs’ colleagues reading a part of the letter that he had received before Jobs’ death and bursting into tears. In the same breath, he says that he has lost his family, wife and friends because of Apple. But the audience doesn’t know why he is crying. Is he sorry about the death of a genius in whose glory he could bask for a moment, or does he regret the fact that he sacrificed his family life to Apple?

BK: To be honest, it occurred to me that he and Jobs might have been lovers.

MS: I almost thought the same, because he was talking about him with such tenderness. It even sounded a bit platonic. Although this documentary offered so many hints, not much was clearly revealed in the end. The audience doesn’t have the chance to create a comprehensive picture.

more articles from a section:  Situational review

2.20The creators of Havel didn’t know that they don’t know. And that’s the worst kind of not knowing!Is director Slávek Horák’s film Havel truly chaos that says nothing at all about the recent history of our Czech nation or its first president? Or are the filmmakers entitled to artistic license and allowed to create whatever they like, despite giving the film and its main character the name Havel? And what does it say about the times we live in that from the legacy of the influential playwright, intellectual, politician, and master of words, the filmmakers chose to focus solely on his slightly sensationalised private life?Kamila Boháčková
1.20Will our civilisation negotiate this turn?American documentarian Jeff Gibbs’ activist film Planet of the Humans, which criticises the way we treat renewable energy sources, has evoked numerous controversial reactions. It’s no surprise that the producer is well-known filmmaker Michael Moore, who released the film freely on YouTube on Earth Day, when the worldwide corona virus pandemic was at its peak.Kamila Boháčková
1.20Caught in the Net should really be on the net if it’s going to change anythingDiscussion about the new film by Vít Klusák a Barbora Chalupová Caught in the NetKamila Boháčková
3.16From Disillusionment to KiskaA discussion on movie Difficult Choice by Zuzana PiussiJitka Lanšperková
2.16Wasted Potential of the Good Old TrabiA film critic, a social scientist and a traveler discuss the latest of the series of films by Dan Přibáň called With Trabants to the Last BreathJitka Lanšperková
1.16Living in a Moral VoidA discussion on new documentary Doomed Beauty by Helena Třeštíková and Jakub HejnaJitka Lanšperková
6.15Multi-layered Personal TestimonyA debate about the film Czechs Against Czechs by Czech documentarian Tomáš KratochvílJitka Lanšperková
3.15Alcohol and Heroin Are All the SameA discussion on Mallory, a new documentary by Helena TřeštíkováJitka Lanšperková
2.15Addicted to Living TogetherDiscussion about movie Always Together directed by Eva TomanováJitka Lanšperková
1.15(Un)usual Energy of the Tribes?In this section, usually people from all kinds of different disciplines assess a specific documentary piece in joint discussion. However, for this issue we decided on a small change.Tomáš Stejskal

starší články

19. 10. 2015

from current issue:

New releaseShooting About KunderaDocumentarian Miloslav Šmídmajer describes the process of making a documentary about Milan Kundera with the working title “Milan Kundera: From the Joke to Insignificance.” Miloslav ŠmídmajerThemeNest in the bedroomPeter Hames, well-known British film historian and author of the book The Czechoslovak New Wave sent his remembrance to Karel Vachek to our magazine.Peter HamesThemeNever stop laughingPaolo Benzi, the Italian film producer and founder of the independent film production company Okta Film, describes for dok.revue how he met famous Czech documentary filmmaker Karel Vachek, who passed away last year. Paolo Benzi is also the main tutor of the Emerging producers in Ji.hlava IDFF.Paolo BenziThemeBehold, if the river is turbulent he is not frightenedIn this English issue of dok.revue we have collected some remembrances to Karel Vachek, the respected Czech documentarist who died in December 2020 at the age of 80. One of the contributors is Olaf Möller, a well-known film theorist and critic collaborating with many renowned film magazines (Film Comment or Sight & Sound), film museums and festivals (e.g. Il Cinema Ritrovato or International Film Festival Rotterdam).Olaf MöllerThemeEvery human being should get to wear comfy shoesThe Czech documentarist Karel Vachek was a chairperson of the jury at Yamagata international documentary film festival (YIDFF) in 2009. The board member of YIDFF and the former director of this festival, Asako Fujioka, has a remembrance of him smoking his pipe and going to the mountains with Japanese poet and filmmaker Yoshimasu Gozo to recite poetry to the skies.Asako FujiokaThemeLike the dog on the beach...American film historian Alice Lovejoy writes her remembrance of Karel Vachek, the remarkable Czech documentarist to whom we dedicate this English issue of dok.revue.Alice LovejoyInterviewThe times of lifelong careers are overAn interview with documentarian Jindřich Andrš, whose film A New Shift won the Czech competition section Czech Joy at Ji.hlava IDFF2020.Vojtěch KočárníkInterviewGoing to the Polish Turf with Our Own TeamInterview with documentary filmmakers Filip Remunda and Vít Klusák about their latest joint film project Once Upon a Time in Poland that shows how religion and faith are misused in contemporary Poland for mass manipulation and political purposes. The film‘s Czech premiere was held as part of the Ji.hlava International Documentary Film Festival 2020.Kamila BoháčkováIntroductionDok.revue 1.21This issue is dedicated to the doyen of Czech documentary filmmaking Karel VachekKamila Boháčková