Jørgen Leth’s Doc.tionary

The Doc.tionary presents definitions written by documentary filmmakers and theorists from their own perspective


Film is a series of images put together. Not a sequence, not a story, but a series of images, nothing more. The order of the images is less important than the single image. The final consequence of that assertion is that the images may be put together blindfolded. That their order may be determined by means of rules that make allowance for a strong element of chance. Like William Burroughs, I consider chance a great inspiration. I allow chance some leeway in my films, during shootings, but often during editing, too. In various ways, I invite chance to join in the game. Rules provide an important working principle for me. I invent rules. A new set for each film – most often with the purpose of delimitating my technical possibilities. What the camera is allowed to do, and what it is not. What the editing can do, and what it cannot. This restrictive discipline is of crucial importance to my work. It is like making mental optics with which things and events in life may be viewed in a particular way. It is a way to create order out of chaos. It is a frame, a Golden Section that focuses and elaborates segments within brief instants of time. And when everything is in place, the rules are plain and fixed, then the attitude is: Let’s see what happens, e.g. 66 Scenes from America, Life in Denmark, Motion Picture. A series of images – that’s what it is. Each image has its story. Each image is a brief instant of time, framed. Time flows through the image with an effortless ease. We observe every motion, hear every sound. It’s like that. I put the images in order. It becomes an order. And each image is put next to another, is fitted into a pattern. Becomes an addition.


The landscape is drawn through the field of vision: the billowing sands of the Sahara in optically deceptive light, with the present leaving the frame from the left and the future and comprehension entering it from the right. James Stewart kisses a woman who looks just like a woman who died; the image moves disturbingly into a memory of the woman he once kissed. Pans reveal associations. Some choose frame and tempo. Others choose what the eye may see. A pan must be an almost imperceptible progression from left to right. Unfortunately many people suffer from a compulsion that the camera must move. There is no such natural law. Static images are the best. Pans are displacements of the chosen frame. Very rarely are pans so ingeniously conceived and contrived that they may be described as well motivated. Mostly pans are evidence of a tourist-like enthusiasm for the surroundings or merely a reflection of a kind of anxiety in the face of a steady picture.


An edit leads from one space to another. An edit can bring sense to unruly, chaotic material, perhaps rendering it too sensible. Or it may breathe life into something dull. Editing means combining, i.e. imposing yourself on the individual image. Some people aim to edit stories into existence. Others want to preserve the raw power of the material. For some people the process starts at the editing table; for others editing is just a way of putting the material into order. It’s like a trip to the barber: do you want a lot off or just a trim? Whoever undertakes the final cut often possesses the controversial right to define the story.


Raw stock is unexposed film. It lives in black paper in metal cans. The assistant cameraman sits down quietly in a corner with his black changing bag and puts the cartridge with the exposed reel and an empty can into the bag. He gazes into thin air without seeing anything, his hands busy in the bag. He pulls out the can of exposed film. He seals it with tape. He puts the new film in. The cartridge emerges and is put into the camera. The cameraman is now ready to expose some more film, i.e. to subject the raw stock to light. Life will be imprinted on the fresh reel. Human movements, the blurred or sharp content of the room will be scribed onto the film. The raw stock will be transformed into exposed negative. Raw stock is highly tangible and magical. All hope may be attached to raw stock. It contains every possibility. The unused film contains the fantasy of furtive signals, unknown meanings. Raw stock rests in a wrapping unsullied by script, set, calculation or zeal.


Seeing means choosing a particular lens. Through our lens we frame a section of life. We can stare into space without seeing a thing. We can see a slice of our world on the table in front of us. We can see individual objects: an empty cup, some sheets of paper, a ballpoint, a packet of Marlboros. We see a few words on the page. We can compose our own nature morte. Or we can go out and gather impressions from chaos. The world consists of what we see. We may see a link, an image. Or perhaps we cannot set our eyes on anything that makes an imprint on our retinas. We can choose a view. The inventory of a situation may seem perfectly comprehensible, but sometimes we will not be able to focus on individual components.


Zoom is a disease. You have a picture but you do not want it. You want to change it. You constantly want to change it. It has got to be bigger. Then it has got to be smaller. The frame is fluid. Indecisiveness has become a technique. Choice has been postponed forever.

(published in the Do anthology)

24. 11. 2012

from current issue:

New releaseOn Adultery as Mirror of Our Own SelvesBarbora Jíchová Tyson, a visual artist, who has been living in America for seventeen years, has finished her first feature film Talking About Adultery this year. According to the author, the film is an essayistic collage and represents a perspective on humanity, which holds the mirror up to us all.Barbora Jíchová TysonNew releaseFREMWhat is it like to shoot a film in Antarctica? Is it possible to get into the head of artificial intelligence? And what is GAI? All this is described by the documentarist Viera Čákanyová in the text she wrote about her new film FREM in dok.revue.Viera ČákanyováNew releaseHavel Speaking, Can You Hear Me?What were the two last years in the life of former dissident, ex-president Václav Havel like? How did he reflect on the fact that he was gradually leaving this world? Documentarian Petr Jančárek talks about his upcoming documentary film capturing the final stretch of Havel’s, life, the rough cut of which was shown at the Ji.hlava IDFF in the Studio 89 section marking this year’s anniversary of the so-called Velvet Revolution.Petr JančárekThemeEmerging Czech female documentariansIs there a new tide of emerging female documentarians in Czech cinema? What’s fascinating about the work of Czech female filmmakers like Johana Ožvold, Greta Stocklassa or Viera Čákany?Will TizardSportHow to Teach Documentary FilmmakingThis year’s Ji.hlava IDFF offered a panel discussion on how documentary filmmaking is taught in Visegrad countries. Methods used to teach documentary filmmaking in different V4 countries were discussed by lecturers from selected schools. Vít Janeček introduced documentary courses at Prague’s FAMU, Attila Kékesi represented Hungarian University of Theatre and Film Arts in Budapest, Viera Čákanyová talked about study programmes at Slovak Academy of Performing Arts in Bratislava – VSMU, and Maria Zmarz-Koczanowicz discussed documentary education at National Film School in Lodz. What emerged from their fruitful discussion? Vít Janeček, Kamila Boháčková, Maria Zmarz-Koczanowicz, Attila Kékesi, Peter KerekesPoemThe reanimation of Mr. PuiuKhavn De La CruzReviewA Place to Take a BreathThe film journalist Janis Prášil compares two documentary portraits of this year – Forman vs. Forman and Jiří Suchý: Tackling Life with Ease on his blog.Janis PrášilReview Music as a Lag Between Death and InfinityJanis Prášil ruminates on Solo – this year´s winner of Ji.hlava Czech Joy section – which comes to cinemas. Did the picture succeed in depicting the inner world, so hard to portray, of a mentally ill musician? And what if it is the illness itself which enables people to take a look into the grievous core of being?Janis PrášilReviewOn Sounds by ImageThe film journalist Antonín Tesař writes about the new film The Sound Is Innocent directed by Johana Ožvold.Antonín TesařInterviewGreta Stoklassa: I Read Rather than Preach the RealityAn interview with the director Greta StoklassaKamila BoháčkováInterviewTo Surprise MyselfWhile the main competition at the International Karlovy Vary Film Festival does not feature any Czech title, the festival’s documentary section has one Czech film to offer: A documentary road movie by Martin Mareček entitled Over the Hills exploring the relationship between a father and a son, as well as the distance that separates us from others. Unlike his previous socially engaged films, the latest title provides a personal and intimate insight. But as Martin Mareček put it in his interview for dok.revue – what is intimate is universal. Marek Hovorka, Petr Kubica, Kamila BoháčkováInterviewKarel Vachek: Films Just Have to Make You Laugh!One of the most original Czech filmmakers Karel Vachek made his ninth film novel called Communism and the Net or the End of Representative Democracy. Fifty years after Prague Spring and thirty years after the Velvet Revolution, Karel Vachek “with his inner laughter” looks back on the evolution of our society and predicts a transformation to direct democracy based on the possibilities of the internet that will allow for the engagement of the whole mankind without the need of representatives. His film Communism will be screened at the beginning of next year at the International Film festival Rotterdam.Kamila BoháčkováIntroductionCzech docs of the year 2019Welcome at the English double issue of dok.revue 2019. This winter issue looks back upon the Czech documentary scene in the year 2019 and serves as an annual book of the most (internationally) interesting Czech documentaries and articles about them at dok.revue.Kamila Boháčkovávideo dok.revueMasterclass: Sergej Dvorcevoj23rd Ji.hlava International Documentary Film Festival