From Disillusionment to Kiska

A discussion on movie Difficult Choice by Zuzana Piussi

Difficult Choice (Zuzana Piussi, 2016)

Slovak documentarian Zuzana Piussi ventured vigorously into a another project tackling a political issue. Her new film Difficult Choice focuses on presidential campaigns in Slovakia, providing a look behind their scenes without taking sides. We talked about political campaigning, her work and the political situation in Slovakia with documentarian and virtual campaign maker Jan Látal (JL) and documentarian, lecturer and curator Andrea Slováková (AS).

The distribution strategy of Difficult Choice was rather specific in that the Slovak premiere of the film was held only several hours before the parliamentary elections. What do you think about this gesture?

JL: In terms of marketing, it’s a great strategy. It is key to release information when it’s relevant to the society. And people tend to focus on politics mainly during the last week before the elections, so in that sense it was excellent timing.

AS: I see, so that’s why the political party of Rado Procházka was such a flop compared to what the opinion polls had indicated! The film asks what and why we should (not) believe in political campaigns. It promotes critical thinking in connection with decision-making and voters’ choices. It was an excellent strategy.

In the beginning, the film raised the question of why people don’t go to vote – and this is also my second question.

AS: There’s no simple answer to that question. In the society we’re living in I consider it my civil obligation to go to elections. So I can only speculate. The loss of trust in politicians sounds like an alibi – also in this film. We don’t live in anarchy, the state is managed by elected representatives. If the nation lacks political elites, it is not only the problem of the “idiots at the top”, but a more complex issue including for example the education system. Changeable from below and from above. Rather than complaining about useless politicians, we should (each from our own position) do at least something to contribute to the formation of intellectual and political elites, but also to the level of critical thinking among the citizens so that they could actively reflect on and act in interaction with those who should take care of the state’s management as civil servants.

JL: However, this question is not the film’s main focus. I saw the film rather as a look into the anatomy of power, Showing how we can govern ourselves, how those who govern and those who are governed need each other. They all have the best intentions. From my own experience I know that politicians often think that they are emissaries of good. From afar, it may look like profiteering and a will to control. However, I believe that every politician is convinced to be working towards the common good.

Difficult Choice (Zuzana Piussi, 2016)

What role do opinions and commentary of philosopher Bělohradský play in the structure of Difficult Choice?

AS: Philosopher and currently a candidate for the Czech senate Bělohradský sitting in a carved wooden armchair next to his library presents consistent argumentation. His role in the film is functional because his analytical comments can help the viewers reflect on their own convictions and opinions.

JL: The film illustrates a principle described by Bělohradský as the authenticity of a first-time statement. When we hear Fico saying that he will go out and kiss women for the first time, it’s funny. But when we hear it for the second and the third time? The author catches us in the same trap against which she warned us earlier. That’s refreshing.

What image of Slovak politicians has Zuzana Piussi created?

JL: Andrej Kiska greatly surprised me – his way of communicating with people and ability to articulate thoughts on the spot. His energy was so impressive and convincing when talking to the students in the school scene. I envy the Slovaks their authentic president. I guess that in his bed at night, Fico is also wondering whether people like him or not. Whether they will perhaps build him a monument one day. I believe that the positive and the negative characters may share a similar motivation.

Difficult Choice shows that democracy is capable of self-preservation.”

AS: I was impressed to see that Kiska did not strive for power. The one who had been called a non-politician suddenly appeared to be the best politician – who has realised that he should work and think in favour of democracy (not democracy as defined by Bělohradský).

Is it possible to see Difficult Choice as an objective documentary as it is presented in some media?

JL: It might be seen as objective in the sense that it doesn’t take sides. But it is an opinionated documentary. Surprisingly, this is good news about democracy. Despite the metaphor of indifferent rats, an apolitical president is elected in the end. That proves that the established system has a self-preserving feedback. When you repeatedly have politicians whom the society cannot or doesn’t want to trust, there still is a chance that they can elect someone who will inspire their trust.

Difficult Choice (Zuzana Piussi, 2016)

AS: No documentary film or filmmaker can always be objective. Only by their way of framing the images, selection of scenes and subsequent editing choices, authors make their films subjective – which is totally fine, because we’re watching a work of art. When seeing them sitting with the camera next to Kiska at the back of the car, I recalled Leacock’s and Drew’s Primary, as if this take was a direct quotation from the film. The authors of Primary tried to achieve some balance by providing each of the candidates equal space. And still, you can make a completely different picture about each of the observed politicians! Also in Piussi’s film, it is important that politicians are captured behind the scenes – how they act and how they speak. We can see how uncertain they are, but also that they, to a certain extent, don’t drop out of their roles.

“Thanks to the observational method, we can see how people behave, but less how they think.”

JL: It’s unbelievable how close Zuzana got to some of the politicians. Especially those who had not been known through media revealed a lot about themselves. Fico didn’t need her, but she needed him. But with the other politicians, it was the other way round. It was fascinating how open they were about almost everything on camera. The financial resources and strategic decisions during campaigns in the Czech Republic are only dealt with behind closed doors.  They disclosed everything in front of the camera. In this respect, Difficult Choice is a valuable film that literally gets on politicians’ skin – which would otherwise be considered almost a contradiction. They are trained not to reveal too much about themselves.

AS: She’s very brave. She doesn’t care what “impression” each of the portrayed politicians will make; her position can be apparent in how she is observing public figures – being interested in their behaviour in various situations. “The observational method reveals how people behave, but less how they think.”

What do you think about the opinion of the PR expert Marek Prchal that a politician is only a product in terms of the marketing campaign?

AS: Yes, from the marketing perspective, politicians are advertised products. At least until the moment when audio-visual media became involved in political campaigns.
“Politicians often lack the courage to be themselves.”

JL: Each product addresses some problems of the target group. In this respect, a politician is truly a product. Which, in itself, needn’t be meant as a derogatory statement. Politicians should be addressing problems of their electorate. However, when problems start to be artificially created to evoke demand for the product, we are in trouble.

Difficult Choice (Zuzana Piussi, 2016)

Why can’t people be themselves and try to hide behind marketing strategies and campaigns and follow advice of PR specialists on how to appear in public and how to win people over?

JL: They lack the courage to be themselves. And if you invest some capital in your campaign that is not even yours, you have an obligation. You can’t be yourself because you are responsible to others. And you start strategizing about what card to play. When we produced a campaign for the Green Party, the marketing polls showed that more than in the quality of education, people are interested in kindergarten capacities. Then you have two options – to remain fully true to yourself and convince the society that your topic is relevant, which is not well possible with invested capital, Or to tailor your portfolio to the people’s needs. But it should always stem from the values that you are promoting. Situations in which you are declaring something that you don’t actually believe sooner or later end in a fiasco.

AS: And what would it mean “to be yourself”? Isn’t every person in social interaction “different” depending on what he or she is confronted with? For me, there’s just one concept of “being oneself”, and that is the integrity of the character. However, it does not necessarily have to be directly related with the existence of marketing.

The film features journalist Jakub Patočka, who mentions the influence of media. He believes that media somehow set an initial agenda regarding what topics should be discussed, which the voters subsequently take for their own and the candidates then try to accommodate these needs in their campaigns. Do you agree?

JL: As a society, we all are one interconnected organism. It’s impossible to blame something on one political party. Media set the agenda according to our needs, and vice versa. Hence, all links in the chain are to blame for manipulation. It is important to try to identify one’s own share and to work with it.

AS: In my opinion, Jakub Patočka is the most populist of all the characters in the film, and I don’t find his opinions worthy of commenting. I was surprised that such a dramaturgically well-structured film, aside from a multi-layered philosophical analysis also provides space to generalisations by an “expert”, “journalist and politician”, none of them being able to reflect on the environment from which the observed protagonists come. This might have been supposed to help achieve a higher level of generalisation; however, in the case of Jakub Patočka, these are only empty words that you can usually hear in pubs that do not convey anything specific, revealing, original, or even analytically valuable.

more articles from a section:  Situational review

2.20The creators of Havel didn’t know that they don’t know. And that’s the worst kind of not knowing!Is director Slávek Horák’s film Havel truly chaos that says nothing at all about the recent history of our Czech nation or its first president? Or are the filmmakers entitled to artistic license and allowed to create whatever they like, despite giving the film and its main character the name Havel? And what does it say about the times we live in that from the legacy of the influential playwright, intellectual, politician, and master of words, the filmmakers chose to focus solely on his slightly sensationalised private life?Kamila Boháčková
1.20Will our civilisation negotiate this turn?American documentarian Jeff Gibbs’ activist film Planet of the Humans, which criticises the way we treat renewable energy sources, has evoked numerous controversial reactions. It’s no surprise that the producer is well-known filmmaker Michael Moore, who released the film freely on YouTube on Earth Day, when the worldwide corona virus pandemic was at its peak.Kamila Boháčková
1.20Caught in the Net should really be on the net if it’s going to change anythingDiscussion about the new film by Vít Klusák a Barbora Chalupová Caught in the NetKamila Boháčková
2.16Wasted Potential of the Good Old TrabiA film critic, a social scientist and a traveler discuss the latest of the series of films by Dan Přibáň called With Trabants to the Last BreathJitka Lanšperková
1.16Living in a Moral VoidA discussion on new documentary Doomed Beauty by Helena Třeštíková and Jakub HejnaJitka Lanšperková
6.15Multi-layered Personal TestimonyA debate about the film Czechs Against Czechs by Czech documentarian Tomáš KratochvílJitka Lanšperková
4.15Tears for Steve JobsThe 19th Jihlava IDFF will show a premiere of a documentary film by the academy award-winning director Alex Gibney, Steve Jobs: Man in the Machine, about the emotional bond that can form between a man and a technical device.Jitka Lanšperková
3.15Alcohol and Heroin Are All the SameA discussion on Mallory, a new documentary by Helena TřeštíkováJitka Lanšperková
2.15Addicted to Living TogetherDiscussion about movie Always Together directed by Eva TomanováJitka Lanšperková
1.15(Un)usual Energy of the Tribes?In this section, usually people from all kinds of different disciplines assess a specific documentary piece in joint discussion. However, for this issue we decided on a small change.Tomáš Stejskal

starší články

27. 06. 2016

from current issue:

New releaseShooting About KunderaDocumentarian Miloslav Šmídmajer describes the process of making a documentary about Milan Kundera with the working title “Milan Kundera: From the Joke to Insignificance.” Miloslav ŠmídmajerThemeNest in the bedroomPeter Hames, well-known British film historian and author of the book The Czechoslovak New Wave sent his remembrance to Karel Vachek to our magazine.Peter HamesThemeNever stop laughingPaolo Benzi, the Italian film producer and founder of the independent film production company Okta Film, describes for dok.revue how he met famous Czech documentary filmmaker Karel Vachek, who passed away last year. Paolo Benzi is also the main tutor of the Emerging producers in Ji.hlava IDFF.Paolo BenziThemeBehold, if the river is turbulent he is not frightenedIn this English issue of dok.revue we have collected some remembrances to Karel Vachek, the respected Czech documentarist who died in December 2020 at the age of 80. One of the contributors is Olaf Möller, a well-known film theorist and critic collaborating with many renowned film magazines (Film Comment or Sight & Sound), film museums and festivals (e.g. Il Cinema Ritrovato or International Film Festival Rotterdam).Olaf MöllerThemeEvery human being should get to wear comfy shoesThe Czech documentarist Karel Vachek was a chairperson of the jury at Yamagata international documentary film festival (YIDFF) in 2009. The board member of YIDFF and the former director of this festival, Asako Fujioka, has a remembrance of him smoking his pipe and going to the mountains with Japanese poet and filmmaker Yoshimasu Gozo to recite poetry to the skies.Asako FujiokaThemeLike the dog on the beach...American film historian Alice Lovejoy writes her remembrance of Karel Vachek, the remarkable Czech documentarist to whom we dedicate this English issue of dok.revue.Alice LovejoySportPandemic as an opportunityJi.hlava's Emerging Producers discuss the opportunity that can emerge from crisisSteve RickinsonInterviewThe times of lifelong careers are overAn interview with documentarian Jindřich Andrš, whose film A New Shift won the Czech competition section Czech Joy at Ji.hlava IDFF2020.Vojtěch KočárníkInterviewGoing to the Polish Turf with Our Own TeamInterview with documentary filmmakers Filip Remunda and Vít Klusák about their latest joint film project Once Upon a Time in Poland that shows how religion and faith are misused in contemporary Poland for mass manipulation and political purposes. The film‘s Czech premiere was held as part of the Ji.hlava International Documentary Film Festival 2020.Kamila BoháčkováIntroductionDok.revue 1.21This issue is dedicated to the doyen of Czech documentary filmmaking Karel VachekKamila Boháčková