A Show in Poldi Kladno Steelworks

Interview about the movie Tears of Steel: Vladimír Stehlík Meets Lubomír Krystlík

Tears of Steel: Vladimír Stehlík Meets Lubomír Krystlík (Tomáš Potočný, 2015)

One of the two films that garnered a Special Mention in the Jihlava IDFF’s competition section for the Best Czech Documentary Film was Tears of Steel: Vladimír Stehlík Meets Lubomír Krystlík by the newcomer, Tomáš Potočný. The film follows the tragicomic story of Vladimír Stehlík, the former CEO of Poldi Kladno Steelworks, who, although long retired, still cannot come to terms with the fact that his once famous factory is already a history. In an interview with dok.revue, Tomáš Potočný offers a look behind the scenes of the film’s shooting with a protagonist who was very hard to work with and a one-day meeting of old friends and colleagues that actually saved the film.

Your film Tears of Steel: Vladimír Stehlík Meets Lubomír Krystlík recounts the fates of the former CEO of Poldi Kladno Steelworks, Vladimír Stehlík. What do you as a documentarian think about this rather controversial figure?
The film as a whole made me realise how problematic it is to make complex judgements and to draw simple conclusions. In the 1990s, Stehlík was someone else than who he is today. In the early 1990s, he was a very charismatic figure, a capable businessman and factory manager. I do believe that he was a good manager at the time when he was about to take over the management of Poldi Kladno. However, his later failures have made their mark. But I’m not in the position to judge whether it was due to his own mistakes or due to political circumstances; the only thing I can rely on is media reports from the period, presented with various intentions and reflecting the interests of various people. However, I no longer have the possibility to analytically reconstruct the company’s accounting, and I am not able to disclose deficiencies in his management or decision-making – which, after all, was never my aim.

Was it difficult to work with someone who publicly presents himself as an unbreakable man and who uncompromisingly asserts his own opinions?
My collaboration with Stehlík was alternately difficult and good. At one point he was very friendly to me. He even talked to me on familiar terms, which I didn’t object to, but I kept my distance. There’s a great age difference between us, we’re about forty years apart. He saw me as a student who was interested in his story. But then there came a moment when he stopped trusting me, thinking I was an agent of the enemy who stole his business from him. Moreover, he is so preoccupied with the case that it is almost impossible to discuss anything else with him. For me as a director, this wasn’t easy at all.

You must have spent quite a lot of time trying to figure out, how to efficiently handle the film and the collaboration with Stehlík.
I tried different strategies to see what would happen and what possibilities would open up. And I found out that it would be extremely difficult to show a situation different than just Stehlík speaking on the camera, because the camera worked as a magnet that provoked Stehlík to lead monothematic monologues. I originally wanted to lead a dialogue, but any questions would only spark further monologues. But we gradually came to find the key. We organised a meeting of Stehlík and some other people who witnessed the turbulent nineties but, in addition to this kick-off, we didn’t stage anything, we only observed the situation. And we came up with a couple of suitable questions.

Tears of Steel: Vladimír Stehlík Meets Lubomír Krystlík

Is this why you invited Krystlík, Stehlík’s personal consultant?
Yes, and it was a big thing, because they hadn’t seen each other for several years. They both respect each other, but they are both very dominant. They have worked together throughout their whole career, they met in the 1980s. Krystlík is an older gentleman and opera singer well-versed in the etiquette who advised Stehlík on how to act, dress and what and how to say. He has retained his mentor-like attitude to this day, and it is clear that he still wishes the former boss of Poldi Kladno to carefully consider what political events to support, to choose words and not to use foul language. And their relationship is still tense. Who dominates the game? The CEO or his advisor who, in many respects, tells him what to do? You can clearly see that in the film.

How much time did you spend shooting with both of the protagonists?
The meeting of these two gentlemen took place within a single day, but we spent almost three years making the film. It was very strenuous to actually ask questions and to provoke an interesting interaction between these two men. It took me some time before I was actually able to choose my questions effectively. And then I just asked, for example, about their heroic moment at the international conference in Düsseldorf and the reaction was immediate.

Did you follow a script or was the interview improvised?
My initial idea was to have an informal conversation with Stehlík about the past and the situation in the business and what it’s like to fall down from the top management of a big company and live on a meagre pension. I hoped he would perhaps unintentionally reveal something from the background of big business, for example how he had to handle negotiations with the prime minister or a foreign partner. I hoped that we would draw a portrait of the 1990s in the Czech Republic on the backdrop of this reflective dialogue. However, I didn’t manage to stimulate this kind of a reflection. Stehlík’s mind works in a different mode than I actually imagined and neither patience nor higher frequency of meetings helped. He kept on repeating his statements regarding the case and he did so in a very stylised manner. My entire effort to open a space for reflection was in vain and my script started to collapse.

What was then your key to shooting a film that won one of the two Special Mentions at this year’s Jihlava IDFF?
The cameraman, Honza Šípek, was a great help – he was telling me that the footage was great, although to me it didn’t seem so. My acknowledgments also go to Míra Janek, whose studio I attended at school. For a certain period of time, I was frustrated and thought I wouldn’t be able to finish the film, because the only thing it shows over and again is the position of a wronged man. Then I managed to organise a meeting with Krystlík, which indicated that the key to the film is to be less serious about it, to add more humour. And all of the relations and the whole situation in the 1990s surfaced on the secondary level.

So you started to approach the film as a show, exactly in line with the opening suggestion of the film’s protagonist.
This clearly articulated decision was made at the editing stage, but during the shooting, we only tried to focus on the less serious moments and to provoke them. However, Stehlík never viewed the film as a show. On the contrary, considering the overall length of the footage, there are not that many moments that could be seen as humorous. And the footage naturally contains a thousand more utterances than the film, we have something like eight shooting days that never made it into the film.

Tears of Steel: Vladimír Stehlík Meets Lubomír Krystlík

You made a film about the CEO of Poldi Kladno Steelworks, the decline and management of which made headlines in the 1990. But you offer hardly any solution or explanation of the events, why?
Because I don’t find it important to deal with what investigative journalists have on their agenda. I am not interested in what actually happened at that time, I wanted to show the atmosphere of the 1990s. And I also tried to shoot a film about the life story of a man, Mr Stehlík. I wanted to capture the transformation of a successful businessman into a pensioner who, as the newspapers say, has to live on less than a hundred crowns per day. I saw a great potential right from the start, especially in combination with plentiful archival sources.

So you made a film about a famous case without actually focusing on the case.
It was never my intention to focus on the case. Later during the shooting, I actually deliberately avoided the question, “What actually happened?” . I didn’t even have to ask the question aloud, because Stehlík was giving the same answer all over again. And it wasn’t my goal to make an analytical and investigative film, I didn’t contact Stehlík’s former colleagues and rivals to hear them out and to confront his position with their version. Of course, I needed to understand the case myself, but I didn’t mind that some of the events had blurred contours. I read many articles from the period and consulted TV archives – and I knew that what I was confronted with was only one perspective of the entire story. Stehlík’s case was attractive for media, which, in many cases, judged him unfairly, for instance when reporting on the “one-crown breakfast affair”. When, still as a CEO, he started to offer his employees subsidised breakfasts, a media surge followed, pointing to Stehlík’s alleged irresponsible expenses in a situation when his company wasn’t doing well. But nobody tried to look for a deeper motivation behind this strategy. Stehlík inherited a socialist plant including the workers who were used to having a breakfast after their arrival to work in the morning. The plant was already in operation, but it was basically idle for the first hour or so. And a big plant like this one generates high costs, and one hour per day brought about significant losses. That’s why Stehlík offered his employees breakfasts for one crown before their working hours. It wasn’t such an economic blunder.

You spent over two years shooting with Stehlík. Having put the Poldi Kladno case into a new context, what do you think of Stehlík’s role? Is he guilty or not? Is he to blame for Poldi’s bankruptcy?
Stehlík wasn’t accused of bringing Poldi to bankruptcy, you can’t blame anyone for the fact that their business goes bankrupt. They accused him of misusing information during business transactions and of breach of trust, simply pointing to the fact that at the time when it was clear that the business would go bust due to loss of funding from the Komerční Bank, Stehlík transferred some shares and funds between individual companies within the Bohemia Art consortium. I am neither an economist nor a lawyer and I can’t tell which of these transfers were in line with the law, and which were not. But I guess that before the decline of Poldi Kladno, there was no indication of asset stripping or any transactions that were going on in other companies.

For the first time in 18 years, Jihlava’s best Czech documentary competition section, Czech Joy, didn’t find its winner. You and Tomáš Kratochvíl received the jury’s Special Mention – what does it mean to you?
To me, this verdict was somewhat unhappy because what the jury’s statement actually said was that none of the films was worthy of the title of the best Czech documentary film. It’s not about me not winning the award, my film is modest and it is more or less a DIY work made together with Honza Šípek. However, I was sorry that the jury only noticed it’s qualities in this context. I would have been happier if there was an actual winner of this competition with Tears of Steel receiving a Special Mention, which would be much more of an honour. It’s unfair to all of the selected films but also to the programmers – we’re left in an embarrassing void indicating that the competition featured no interesting film. And I am not sure how many readers scanning media reports will realise that this is not an objective verdict, but an opinion of a five-member jury.

more articles from a section:  Interview

F2.18Special little momentsInterview with Antonio Di Biase, the director of De Sancto Ambrosio movie, which has the world premiere in Opus Bonum competition at 22nd Ji.hlava International Documentary Film Festival.Matěj Pořízek
F2.18Are we experiencing dystopia today?Interview with Frédérick Cousseau, the director of the poetic documentary called NU, which has the premiere in Opus Bonum competition at 22nd Ji.hlava IDFF.Tomáš Poštulka
F2.18Freedom of ChoiceInterview with Jacky Goldberg, the director of Flesh Memory, which will have its international premiere in Opus Bonum competition
F1.18I like to find other ways to tell a storyInterview with Jorge Pelicano, the director of the Until Porn Do Us Part, which has the premiere in Opus Bonum competition at 22nd Ji.hlava IDFF.Eliška Charvátová
F1.18Wim Wenders on Pope Francis: Courageous, Fearless, Extremely HonestMicro-interview with Wim Wenders about his film Pope Francis: A Man of His Word
F1.18‘My Unknown Soldier’ Director’s Family Secret: ‘There Was a Hole…’Interview with Anna Kryvenko, the director of My Unknown Soldier
F1.18Ji.hlava Chief Marek Hovorka on Keeping the Docu Fest FreshInterview with Marek Hovorka, the director of Ji.hlava IDFFWill Tizard
1.18Are Polish filmmakers suicidals?Interview with Polish Director Piotr StasikMartin Svoboda
F4.17Bylo pro mě problematické na někoho namířit kameruRozhovor s Violou Ježkovou o jejím filmu Všechno má svůj čas
F3.17Nepohřbený LeninRozhovor s Tomášem Glancem, dramaturgem festivalové sekce Ikona Lenin.Veronika Jančová

starší články

02. 12. 2015

from current issue:

New releaseOn Adultery as Mirror of Our Own SelvesBarbora Jíchová Tyson, a visual artist, who has been living in America for seventeen years, has finished her first feature film Talking About Adultery this year. According to the author, the film is an essayistic collage and represents a perspective on humanity, which holds the mirror up to us all.Barbora Jíchová TysonNew releaseFREMWhat is it like to shoot a film in Antarctica? Is it possible to get into the head of artificial intelligence? And what is GAI? All this is described by the documentarist Viera Čákanyová in the text she wrote about her new film FREM in dok.revue.Viera ČákanyováNew releaseHavel Speaking, Can You Hear Me?What were the two last years in the life of former dissident, ex-president Václav Havel like? How did he reflect on the fact that he was gradually leaving this world? Documentarian Petr Jančárek talks about his upcoming documentary film capturing the final stretch of Havel’s, life, the rough cut of which was shown at the Ji.hlava IDFF in the Studio 89 section marking this year’s anniversary of the so-called Velvet Revolution.Petr JančárekThemeEmerging Czech female documentariansIs there a new tide of emerging female documentarians in Czech cinema? What’s fascinating about the work of Czech female filmmakers like Johana Ožvold, Greta Stocklassa or Viera Čákany?Will TizardSportHow to Teach Documentary FilmmakingThis year’s Ji.hlava IDFF offered a panel discussion on how documentary filmmaking is taught in Visegrad countries. Methods used to teach documentary filmmaking in different V4 countries were discussed by lecturers from selected schools. Vít Janeček introduced documentary courses at Prague’s FAMU, Attila Kékesi represented Hungarian University of Theatre and Film Arts in Budapest, Viera Čákanyová talked about study programmes at Slovak Academy of Performing Arts in Bratislava – VSMU, and Maria Zmarz-Koczanowicz discussed documentary education at National Film School in Lodz. What emerged from their fruitful discussion? Vít Janeček, Kamila Boháčková, Maria Zmarz-Koczanowicz, Attila Kékesi, Peter KerekesPoemThe reanimation of Mr. PuiuKhavn De La CruzReviewA Place to Take a BreathThe film journalist Janis Prášil compares two documentary portraits of this year – Forman vs. Forman and Jiří Suchý: Tackling Life with Ease on his blog.Janis PrášilReview Music as a Lag Between Death and InfinityJanis Prášil ruminates on Solo – this year´s winner of Ji.hlava Czech Joy section – which comes to cinemas. Did the picture succeed in depicting the inner world, so hard to portray, of a mentally ill musician? And what if it is the illness itself which enables people to take a look into the grievous core of being?Janis PrášilReviewOn Sounds by ImageThe film journalist Antonín Tesař writes about the new film The Sound Is Innocent directed by Johana Ožvold.Antonín TesařInterviewGreta Stoklassa: I Read Rather than Preach the RealityAn interview with the director Greta StoklassaKamila BoháčkováInterviewTo Surprise MyselfWhile the main competition at the International Karlovy Vary Film Festival does not feature any Czech title, the festival’s documentary section has one Czech film to offer: A documentary road movie by Martin Mareček entitled Over the Hills exploring the relationship between a father and a son, as well as the distance that separates us from others. Unlike his previous socially engaged films, the latest title provides a personal and intimate insight. But as Martin Mareček put it in his interview for dok.revue – what is intimate is universal. Marek Hovorka, Petr Kubica, Kamila BoháčkováInterviewKarel Vachek: Films Just Have to Make You Laugh!One of the most original Czech filmmakers Karel Vachek made his ninth film novel called Communism and the Net or the End of Representative Democracy. Fifty years after Prague Spring and thirty years after the Velvet Revolution, Karel Vachek “with his inner laughter” looks back on the evolution of our society and predicts a transformation to direct democracy based on the possibilities of the internet that will allow for the engagement of the whole mankind without the need of representatives. His film Communism will be screened at the beginning of next year at the International Film festival Rotterdam.Kamila BoháčkováIntroductionCzech docs of the year 2019Welcome at the English double issue of dok.revue 2019. This winter issue looks back upon the Czech documentary scene in the year 2019 and serves as an annual book of the most (internationally) interesting Czech documentaries and articles about them at dok.revue.Kamila Boháčkovávideo dok.revueMasterclass: Sergej Dvorcevoj23rd Ji.hlava International Documentary Film Festival